Do women have an elevated standing in the Christian community?

This post was written for Release the APE a month ago, and it was the #3 post of the year. If you’re interested, you can see what the top five were for 2013 here.

A few weekends ago, I spoke at a conference titled “Renewing Gender Relations.” It was an honor to be speaking alongside other plenary speakers such as Dr. Mimi Haddad, the president of Christians for Biblical Equality, and Rev. Dr. Grace May, president of Women of Wonder.

I spoke on the synergy of men and women in partnership, and was led to offer a history lesson.

My main question came from the subtitle of Rodney Stark’s The Rise of Christianity: how does the obscure, marginal Jesus movement become the dominant religious force in the Western world?

In his book, he takes a sociologist’s lens on Christian history, and says that without mass conversions or events, Christianity could achieve 5 to 7.5 million adherents by 300 AD just by having 40% growth each decade through relational evangelism.

Then, with each chapter, he unpacks a counter-intuitive reason why the Christian faith was growing. Christianity reached the middle and upper classes, and not just the poor. Their mission to Jewish people was rather successful, instead of unsuccessful. Christians offered basic care to the sick during plagues when their own pagan relatives left them for dead, increasing the chance of survival nine-fold instead of just relying on miracles. Christians were concentrated in urban areas where they could welcome the steady inflow from surrounding areas, and they could minister to the urban chaos and grind, due to the strength of their community. And during persecution, the way martyrs would face their death greatly impressed the Greco-Roman world.

But there was one more factor: women had an elevated standing within the Christian community.

“Christianity was unusually appealing,” writes Rodney Stark, “because within Christian subculture women enjoyed far higher status than did women in the Greco-Roman world at large.”

His reasons from a sociological perspective are interesting. In a Greco-Roman world where men vastly outnumbered the women, the women outnumbered the men in Christian circles. They were usually the primary converts, who would later lead their husbands to faith. And the Christian faith gave them incredible advantages: in a world where men were expected to be promiscuous, Christianity demanded fidelity for both men and women. In that way, women enjoyed higher security and equality in their marriages. In a time when women were often given over in marriage by age 12, Christian women married later and had more choice. And where the Greco-Roman world didn’t want many children, Christians were encouraged to be fruitful and multiply, and with their prohibitions against infanticide (which often targeted girls) and abortion, more female babies were allowed to live.

But in all of this, women were also leaders of the church. Many women were martyred, and those who were killed for their faith often held positions of authority in the church. At the Council of Chalcedon in 451, they specified that deaconesses needed to be single and over 40. The very fact that they had qualifications for deaconesses must mean that, obviously, they existed.

“Nevertheless,” writes Stark, “there is a virtual consensus among historians of the early church as well as biblical scholars that women held positions of honor and authority within early Christianity.”

It seemed that Christian women enjoyed far more privileges and status than other women in the Greco-Roman world, which leads to a question:

Do Christian women today enjoy more privilege and status than women outside of our communities?

For if the answer isn’t in the positive, I wonder what that means for the health of the church. Because when women did, it helped a marginal sect become the dominant religious force in the Western world.

My question is: what happens when they don’t?

View All


  1. […] about issues around gender, faith and the church, I was intrigued this week when I stumbled across this post by my friend James Choung. It’s a post about the effect that early Christianity had on women […]


  2. > Do Christian women today enjoy more privilege and status than women outside of our communities?
    That depends on which community (culture or sub-culture) you’re comparing to.

    While I agree that the contrast in the way women were treated in the Christian community in the ancient world was promotional (and good), I think it’s folly to unthinkingly conclude that elevating women now – in all cases – would likewise be positive.

    Consider finding a starving dog. If we increase the dog’s food intake, his health will improve. We cannot then conclude that constantly increasing the amount of food we feed the dog will continue to improve the dog’s health. At a certain point, he’ll become unhealthy again; this time because of too much food.

    If the broader culture outside of the Church began to worship women, it would be sinful for us to try to one-up them. God’s Word is unchanging, and I caution myself against taking cues from a changing world. I think it’s probably better to extract the _timeless_ lessons that were learned in those early days of the Church. For example, the fact that women had a say in who they marry, and that men couldn’t just discard their wives, became a Christian practice. Today, we can apply the same principle in the midst of a culture that let’s men and women treat marriage casually.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.